In Opposing Naturalism in Science, the Bible is More Foundational than Design

Here is a link to a guest post that I wrote:  https://veritasdomain.wordpress.com/2017/08/23/guest-post-in-opposing-naturalism-in-science-the-bible-is-more-foundational-than-design/

I contrast this graph from Paul Nelson of the Discovery Institute (see here), which marginalizes the issue of what the Bible says about the age of the earth:

. . . with mine, based on these questions:

  • Are the Metaphysical Beliefs Consistent with Design in Nature?
  • Do the Metaphysical Beliefs Entail Rejection of a Naturalistic Epistemology?
  • Do the Metaphysical Beliefs Require Divine Revelation?
  • Are the Metaphysical Beliefs Consistent with Absolutely Authoritative Revelation about Creation?

 

 

This entry was posted in Apologetics. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to In Opposing Naturalism in Science, the Bible is More Foundational than Design

  1. Pingback: Early September 2017 Presuppositional Apologetics Links | The Domain for Truth

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  
Please enter an e-mail address